Kenya Signs a $3 Billion EV Deal With Geely. On the Same Day, America Rolled Back Its Own EV Rules
Introduction
Two electric-vehicle headlines landed on the same date, on opposite sides of the world, pointing in opposite directions.
In Nairobi, President William Ruto witnessed the signing of a memorandum of understanding between the Kenyan government and Endelevu Enterprise Corporation for a proposed US$3 billion electric vehicle manufacturing and green mobility project, with China's Geely Auto Group named as the Chinese partner. The signing happened at State House on Tuesday, 6 October 2026.
In Washington, the US Transportation Department had already finalised revised federal fuel economy standards through 2031, and the president publicly signed off on them — a rollback of the Biden-era framework that had been designed to push the American fleet toward electric. The American Energy Alliance, summarising the decision, put the change bluntly: the fleetwide average requirement drops to 34.5 miles per gallon by 2031, down from 50.4 mpg, which the department estimated would cut the average cost of a new vehicle by about US$1,300.
One country is signing a cheque to build electric cars where none are made. The other has just made them cheaper to skip. Both moves are rational responses to their own local economics. Taken together, they sketch the shape of the EV transition in October 2026: no longer a single global policy direction, but a set of regional bets.
What Kenya Actually Signed
The Kenyan figures are specific and they were reported consistently across multiple outlets on the day.
According to The Standard, the proposed project comprises an assembly plant with an annual capacity of 50,000 four-wheel vehicles, and a second facility capable of producing 100,000 two-wheelers and light-mobility vehicles each year. The package also lists 1,000 solar-powered charging hubs and a digital platform able to manage up to 100,000 green vehicles.
The Star and the state broadcaster KBC carried the same numbers. The job forecast is equally specific: roughly 2,000 direct jobs, more than 20,000 indirect opportunities through suppliers and logistics, and up to 80,000 further roles in fleet management, operations and related services. Kenyan outlets converted the US$3 billion into a range of roughly KSh388 billion to KSh390 billion depending on the exchange rate used.
The signing itself was procedural. Investment Principal Secretary Abubakar Hassan signed for the government, alongside an official from Endelevu. The presidency's press service confirmed the memorandum was signed at State House and named Endelevu's chairman as Susong Tong, who called it a milestone for Kenya's car industry.
The Catch, Which Is Large
This is a memorandum of understanding, not a contract.
The Rio Times, in the most sceptical of the day's write-ups, laid out what has not been disclosed: Endelevu's country of registration, its owners, and its track record. Whether Geely will put in its own capital is unknown. Geely is named as Endelevu's partner, but its exact role and financial stake have not been published, and no comment from Geely itself was carried in Kenyan coverage.
No county, site or special economic zone has been named for either plant. No construction or production timeline was given. The financing structure is unknown. The text of the memorandum itself has not been published.
Ruto's own framing conceded as much. "A Memorandum is a framework. It is not the finish line," he said, calling for a move "from signature to definitive agreements, from agreements to groundbreaking, and from groundbreaking to production." On the gap between announcement and factory, he was blunter still: "A signature does not build a factory." He directed the Ministry of Investments, Trade and Industry, through Invest Kenya, to coordinate approvals, land and infrastructure.
For scale, 50,000 vehicles a year is modest globally — a single large assembly plant in the United States often builds several hundred thousand. But the comparison that matters locally is with what came before: in September 2025, a UAE-backed firm called Aquilastar began building an electric vehicle plant at Olkaria, backed by the Alsayegh Group, reported by Business Daily as a KSh19.4 billion (about US$150 million) project also targeting 50,000 units a year. The new proposal is roughly twenty times larger in money terms and additionally covers charging and software.
Why Kenya Is Doing This at All
Kenya has no domestic crude oil. Its Mombasa refinery stopped processing in 2013, so petrol and diesel are imported. Most vehicles on Kenyan roads are used imports, many shipped from Japan. The country pays for both the fuel and the vehicles in hard currency, which is the economic problem Ruto kept returning to.
"For decades, Kenya has imported the fuel that runs our vehicles, and the vehicles that burn that fuel," he said. "We have paid for both in hard currency. And with every shipment, we have exported jobs that should have been created here. We are determined to change that equation."
There is a second reason specific to this project: Kenya's electricity mix. Ruto cited electricity consumed in charging electric vehicles rising from 2.92 million kilowatt-hours in 2024 to 8.43 million kWh in 2025, a 188 per cent increase in one year. He framed Kenya's geothermal, wind, solar and hydro resources as a structural advantage — "When we import fuel, we import price shocks. When we generate our own power, we generate our own stability" — which is also why the proposed charging network is specified as solar-powered rather than simply grid-connected.
That growth is off a small base, but the direction matters. The government launched a National Electric Mobility Policy in February 2026, and in May Ruto declared the first 100,000 imported electric vehicles duty-free. The government also ordered 3,000 electric vehicles for security and administration officers. Local assembly was already happening in a limited form: startups including BasiGo, which runs electric buses, and Roam, which makes electric motorcycles, operate in the capital.
The export logic is explicit. Ruto said Kenya does not want to assemble for one market: vehicles meeting East African Community Rules of Origin requirements would access the regional bloc, an eight-country market.
The Geely Question
Geely is a large Chinese automaker based in Hangzhou, and it controls Sweden's Volvo Cars. The Standard describes Geely Auto Group as a Fortune Global 500 company with annual revenues of about US$50 billion operating across 88 countries and regions.
That gives the deal a specific place in a larger contest. Chinese-made electric vehicles face US tariffs of at least 100 percent, which pushes Chinese brands toward Africa, Latin America and Asia. Geely also has direct US exposure through Volvo, whose EX90 electric SUV is built at a plant in Ridgeville, South Carolina.
The geopolitical subtext is not subtle. Kenya is a major non-NATO ally of the United States, a status granted in 2024. China financed the Mombasa–Nairobi railway. Both powers are courting Nairobi. Meanwhile a US spending law extended the African Growth and Opportunity Act — which grants many African goods duty-free entry — to 31 December 2028.
Meanwhile, in Washington
The American rollback is the other half of this story, and it is not merely symbolic.
Under the Biden framework, required fuel efficiency rose 8 percent annually for model years 2024 and 2025, 10 percent for 2026, then 2 percent for passenger cars and 4 percent for light trucks from 2027 through 2031, with fines for automakers who fell short. The Trump administration's December 2025 proposal instead revised down the 2022 model year standard and set increases of 0.25 to 0.5 percent annually through 2031.
The market data cited alongside the decision is stark. Total American EV sales peaked at 437,487 vehicles in the third quarter of 2025 — the last quarter with the federal purchase credit available — and fell to about 239,000 in the third quarter of 2026. Electric vehicles dropped from roughly 10 percent of the US new-car market to 6 percent, even as average EV range rose to about 300 miles and global battery pack prices fell 21 percent.
The charging buildout fell short too. Congress put US$7.5 billion into the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure program in 2021 to fund more than 30,000 charging ports; a June 2026 Congressional Research Service report found 183 NEVI-funded charging stations across 20 states had actually been installed.
Hybrids, meanwhile, took the share. In the second quarter of 2026 hybrids accounted for 16 percent of new vehicle purchases against 6 percent for battery electrics — a trend this site has covered in detail, since it reshapes how the battery supply chain is actually being used.
Conclusion
Kenya's memorandum is a bet on importing and eventually building Chinese electric vehicles to solve a fuel-import and trade-balance problem. It is also a bet that African manufacturing capacity, rather than import incentives alone, is where the next phase of electrification gets built. Both bets are unsettled: the counterparty's registration is undisclosed, the site is unnamed, and the financing is unknown.
The US decision to cut its fleetwide fuel economy requirement to 34.5 mpg by 2031 is a bet that cheaper conventional vehicles will sell better than mandated ones. The early market response, with EV share at 6 percent and hybrids at 16 percent, tentatively supports it — while the costs of that decision, borne by an $100 billion domestic manufacturing investment that will now compete against cheaper ICE supply, are not yet fully visible.
Both stories share a root: electric vehicles are no longer being adopted on a single global policy curve. They are being adopted where the economics of fuel, currency and industrial policy happen to line up, at different speeds and in opposite directions.
Images
![]()
Traffic on Uhuru Highway in Nairobi, the arterial named in Kenyan reporting on the import-bill problem the memorandum is meant to address. Every vehicle in frame is a conventional petrol or diesel car — there are no electric cars and no charging points visible. Real photograph, not a rendering.
![]()
A purple matatu — the shared minibus that is Nairobi's dominant public transport vehicle — on a city street. The 100,000 two-wheelers and light-mobility vehicles in the proposed Kenyan project are a different segment entirely, and nothing electric or charging-related appears in this frame. Real photograph.
![]()
A container ship at a Kenyan port terminal under gantry cranes — the import route Kenya's memorandum is designed to displace for finished vehicles. This image illustrates the logistics picture only: no vehicles, no charging infrastructure and no plant are visible. Real photograph.
![]()
The Nairobi central business district seen from a rooftop at golden hour. No factory, no assembly line and no charging hubs — none of the proposed project's facilities have been sited, and no site has been announced. Real photograph.
Illustrative photographs of Nairobi streets and a Kenyan container port. Wikimedia Commons, CC-licensed, used under fair use for reporting.
References
- Ruto unveils Sh390bn Geely electric mobility plan — The Standard
- Ruto witnesses Sh390bn electric vehicle investment deal — The Star
- Kenya Signs Early US$3 Billion Electric Car Deal — The Rio Times
- Trump's New Fuel Standards Officially End Biden's EV Mandate — American Energy Alliance
- Kenya signs Ksh390bn framework for proposed EV investment — 5050markets